A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025 | of 2026

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #366 - Ecology - Right to the City: Capital's Assault on Our Spaces (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 18 Jan 2026 08:04:04 +0200


The project for a new stadium in Brest is not an isolated phenomenon[4]. The construction of this new stadium follows urban planning logics that are very common under predatory capitalism. Beyond simply comparing projects, we can build a vision of the city capable of transforming it.
The desire for a new stadium on the outskirts of Brest is just the latest in a multitude of projects seeking to force top-level football clubs to leave their historic homes. This phenomenon can be explained by the excessive inflation of football, where the fight to avoid relegation from Ligue 1 is at least as much a race for revenue as it is a matter of sporting results in a league that itself suffers from the economic pressure of other European leagues.

The construction of a new stadium provides the developer (private or public) with an opportunity for the development, or even redevelopment, of a site. The chosen locations are systematically on the outskirts of cities. In some cases, such as in Brest, the land has not yet been developed, and the new infrastructure will contribute to urban sprawl. In other cases, such as in Turin, the land is located in a neighborhood considered "run-down," inhabited by populations of African descent and Roma, for example. The stadium will allow for "resolving this situation," that is, gentrifying the neighborhood[1].

A city transformed into an amusement park
These new developments embody a functionalism of space, meaning that they organize space around a single activity: in this case, consumption. Indeed, the football stadium is no longer primarily a space focused on entertainment; football becomes a "pretext" for developing commercial activities within the stadium itself. For the largest stadiums, an integrated shopping center becomes absolutely essential, and the addition of extra amenities such as hotels, retail stores, and leisure facilities leads to a more "theme park" model. To attract customers to these ever-increasing stores, a new, more "family-oriented" clientele is also needed-in other words, customers with greater purchasing power. This is achieved through an overall increase in ticket prices, a reduction in the availability of cheap seats, and measures hostile to ultras[2]. Building a new stadium in a suburban area is an effective way to overcome the limitations imposed by the urban forms of the (often working-class) neighborhoods where historic stadiums are located, while simultaneously bringing it closer to new target audiences (higher-income suburban families with cars).

The goal is to transform spaces into places of consumption to maximize profits. This logic is clearly not inherent to the world of football, or even to sport in general. Under capitalism, the commodification of space is an inevitable force driven by the need for growth imposed on all competing businesses. This type of analysis can be applied to industrial parks, open-air shopping centers, and tourist districts, which transform cities into mini "theme parks" designed to extract maximum value. The race for investment, in which territories compete, leads political decision-makers to allow the forces of capital to dictate the new forms that the city must take.

Faced with this, the struggles we wage on the ground must be guided by a political project. What kind of city do we want to shape our transformative vision? These struggles must also serve as the foundation for this vision and thus create a genuine right to the city.

Developing a program for a right to the city should allow the various areas of struggle to converge at the local level. The issue of housing can be linked to the issue of tourism, which is itself connected to the issue of territorial marketing. A new stadium is often marketed as a way to improve a city's brand image[3].

The cycle that begins with the 2026 municipal elections will be a new battleground concerning the vision of the city. In the United States, in New York and Seattle, socialists have fought and won around the themes of the right to the city and housing. It is likely that such issues will also emerge in France and elsewhere in the world. While convergences may exist with municipal socialism (the real kind), the social movement must maintain its autonomy and advocate for qualitative transformation within cities.

Times Square, emblem of a city entirely at the service of capitalism.

Wikimedia/Terabass
Building a Program for the Right to the City
Social-democratic approaches, such as the 15-minute city, contain a fundamental contradiction, as stated by its theorist Carlos Moreno. Indeed, according to him, "there are aspects[of urban organization]that have no solution because they depend on changes by private companies." As environmental activists, trade unionists, or libertarian communists, we have the tools to overcome this contradiction.

For example, the question of access to employment in a city that aims to be less car-dependent is central. We have already addressed the issue of mobility in the pages of Alternative libertaire, but we can delve deeper based on our own on-the-ground experience within our local unions and work collectives. The threat of job losses often allows Capital to choose the location of workplaces and impose its urban policies. These geographical considerations have real effects on the balance of power between capital and labor (teleworking, potential union involvement, etc.). Many bridges can be built to propose, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city, a transition program capable of fueling the struggles.

Corentin (UCL Finistère)

I would like to receive the weekly newsletter. * Your email address *
Submit

[1]Pietro Palvarini and Simone Tosi, "Globalization, stadiums and the consumerist city: The case of the new Juventus stadium in Turin," European Journal for Sport and Society, 2013.

[2]Far from combating sexist violence or racism, repressive measures can even encourage them. See, for example, "Abusive searches and sexual violence: the Minister of Sports denigrates the voices of female supporters," Dialectik-football.info.

[3]See in particular "Collective Mobility: Free Public Transport, a Societal Choice," Alternative libertaire no. 365, November 2025, and "https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?ZFE-L-impossible-ecologie-liberale,"; Alternative libertaire no. 362, July-August 2025.

[4]See "Football: Red Card Against Billionaire Football," Alternative libertaire no. 366, December 2025.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Droit-a-la-ville-Le-Capital-a-l-assaut-de-nos-espaces
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center