|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #11-26 - Speed Slows Us Down. In the Vortex of Information Flow (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 12 May 2026 07:12:04 +0300
The communication era, along with the concept of the Global Village, is
frequently touted as the pinnacle of information diffusion, offering
unprecedented access to a vast array of knowledge. Unlike our
predecessors, who lived in an environment characterized by limited
information availability, we have an abundance of easily accessible
data. ---- However, even in times before the advent of computers and the
internet, the paradox "too much information equals no information" was
well-known. The excessive amount of available data can hinder our
ability to locate relevant information, generating a sense of overwhelm
and decision paralysis, particularly when it comes to making important
decisions. This information overload can lead to frustration and have
negative effects on our cognitive abilities, affecting our way of
thinking, learning, and perceiving reality.
The "speed" factor further exacerbates this paradox. Despite being
accustomed to dealing with a wealth of information, we often fail to
realize how its speed of dissemination affects our relationship with it.
While computers surpass our capabilities in certain tasks, speed itself
can be an obstacle and even a blocking factor. Anyone who has searched
the Internet knows that the results often far exceed our ability to
process them.
The information revolution, which has also radically transformed the
communications sector, has made an immense amount of information
available, and at an increasingly rapid rate. Major news sites are
constantly updated with real-time content and sometimes feature
timelines that illustrate the minute-by-minute evolution of a
significant event. The speed of news dissemination is considered
essential to maintaining users' attention and interest. One important
statistic that can be deduced from server reports is the average time a
user spends on a specific web page. A longer time spent on a page
corresponds to greater exposure to advertising.
When information is transmitted at slower speeds, it remains manageable,
within certain limits. However, as speed increases, we find ourselves
immersed in a kind of temporal vortex, constantly bombarded by a
relentless flow of new information. This phenomenon can instantly render
newly acquired information obsolete.
Speed also has a significant impact when we encounter contradictions.
Analyzing rapidly transmitted contradictory data is nearly impossible.
We are easily influenced by the first data we receive, whether correct
or incorrect, simply because it reaches our brain first. Speed poses a
significant obstacle to fact checking, a process that requires time to
distinguish useful information from worthless information.
Another negative effect is the influence that speed has on our
decision-making process, causing us to shift from a reflective to a
reactive approach. Without sufficient time for rational processing, a
gut response is likely to prevail. While this reaction may be
appropriate in emergency situations, such as the sudden need to brake to
avoid a pedestrian, it is not necessarily the optimal solution in other
contexts. The human brain, in fact, is more complex than an AI algorithm
and processes information at variable speeds. Even if we are able to
read a text quickly, the process of comprehension, verification, and
memorization takes longer than the computer system that presented it.
We live in an era characterized by a relentless and rapid flow of a
considerable amount of information, some of which is junk, making its
effective processing increasingly difficult. The natural reaction would
be to disconnect and devote oneself to more rewarding activities, rather
than endlessly watching the news scroll by on a screen. This choice may
be acceptable for individuals with little interest in cultivating
interpersonal relationships or contributing to social change. In other
cases, it is possible to adopt individual and collective strategies to
mitigate the damage caused by the excessive speed of the information flow.
You can devote more time to reading, preferably in print, books, and
in-depth articles on topics of interest, resisting the temptation to
immediately conduct online research following a curiosity sparked by
reading.
You can, for one or more days a week, abstain from checking your email,
consulting your usual news sites, accessing your favorite social media,
and turning off phone notifications. Although this is a complex and
demanding undertaking, it is feasible to significantly reduce the number
of information sources you use. Given the impossibility of reading
everything, you should favor transparent sources that publicly correct
any errors, prioritize in-depth analysis over "breaking news," and
verify information before publication.
When dealing with a relevant but controversial topic, it is advisable to
dedicate time to methodically and systematically exploring positions
that are not immediately convincing, in order to avoid finding yourself
in a situation of indecision between unclear alternatives.
One of the most widespread and persistent myths of the digital age is
that of "multitasking," or the supposed ability to perform multiple
tasks simultaneously. In the context of information, however, it is
essential to focus attention on a single source at a time. Therefore, it
is inadvisable to keep the television on or listen to a podcast while
reading.
Even more complex, but equally important, would be to create collective
environments that foster the slow circulation of information. It would
also be useful to create discussion groups focused on in-depth analysis
of specific topics, rather than the compulsive exchange of links, memes,
and comments on the latest news.
Similarly, it would be necessary to develop networks that allow for the
construction of collective "fact-checking" processes, not exclusively
dependent on official websites, in order to overcome individual
limitations and form a sort of "collective intelligence" to avoid
drowning in the stormy sea of information.
Pepsy
https://umanitanova.org/la-velocita-che-ci-rallenta-nel-vortice-del-flusso-informativo/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Germany, Dortmund, AGDO: The apple and the trunk - Ilan Shalif - The best-kept secret about the revolution just revealed (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(de) France, UCL AL #370 - Kultur Lektüre: VISA, "Neue Faschismen: Unionsreaktionen" (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
A-Infos Information Center