|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #43 - Iranian Anarchists: "We continue to organize and resist" - Gabriel Fonten interviews the Anarchist Front (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Fri, 8 May 2026 09:12:25 +0300
When you last spoke with Freedom, protests in Iran were rapidly
spreading and intensifying, but repression was also increasing. Can you
explain what has happened since then and what your collective has done?
---- Since our last interview, the situation in Iran has changed
violently and unprecedentedly. Widespread protests in many cities have
been met with severe repression. Security forces have attacked
protesters using live ammunition; thousands have been killed or injured,
and tens of thousands arrested. A tense security climate has spread
across the country.
There are also reports and documented evidence indicating that, under
current wartime conditions, some detainees are being held in locations
exposed to airstrikes and are effectively being used as human shields.
In the midst of this situation, before the movement had a chance to
regroup, another development occurred: on February 28, 2026, large-scale
military strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran began,
hitting hundreds of targets across the country. Several senior
commanders and political figures of the Islamic Republic were killed in
these attacks, and the country is now in a state of war.
The Islamic Republic's power structure is facing a serious crisis, but
the country's political future remains uncertain and contested.
US and Israeli forces have targeted numerous sites in Iran, and in these
attacks, not only military targets but also civilians have been killed.
At the same time, the Islamic Republic has used its missile capabilities
to strike targets in the region.
These clashes endanger the lives of millions of people across the
region, and hundreds of civilians have lost their lives so far. The
region's historical experience also shows that foreign intervention has
rarely led to real freedom and has often produced new forms of
domination, instability, and geopolitical competition.
Under these conditions, our activities as anarchists have continued. We
have sought to prevent these voices from being silenced in the midst of
repression and war by documenting events, publishing statements,
maintaining international solidarity networks, and broadcasting the
voices of workers, women, and various sectors of society.
At the same time, we have placed particular emphasis on broadening
discussions on self-organization and horizontal organizing in
neighborhoods, workplaces, and universities, and connecting these nuclei
with broader networks of social solidarity.
We believe that without such social bases, every wave of protest will
remain vulnerable to state repression.
Have people managed to defend themselves from the repression they have
experienced?
In many cases, people have sought to defend themselves in a variety of
ways: from creating solidarity networks to care for the wounded and
assist the families of detainees, to various forms of resistance in the
streets. However, we must be realistic: the Islamic Republic's
repressive apparatus is extremely vast and highly organized, which has
made collective defense difficult.
Under these conditions, people have developed methods such as rapidly
dispersing into the streets, organizing anonymously, and supporting each
other within neighborhoods. In some regions, such as Kurdistan and
Baluchistan, where there is a longer history of social resistance, local
communities have in some cases been better able to protect themselves.
In large cities, however, repression has been extremely harsh.
The most vulnerable group remains political prisoners, particularly
those arrested during recent protests, held in extremely dangerous
conditions and still facing the threat of heavy sentences or even execution.
The experience of this period shows that local social solidarity
networks can play an important role in collective defense and supporting
resistance.
When we last interviewed the Anarchist Front, the Iranian government had
just completely blocked the internet. Have there been significant
changes in your ability to communicate and access the internet since
then? Have people managed to circumvent these restrictions?
The Iranian government continues to use internet blocks or restrictions
as one of its main tools of repression. In recent years, whenever
internet access has been widely disrupted, it has almost always
coincided with violent crackdowns and the direct use of firearms against
protesters.
With the outbreak of war, internet blackouts were again implemented on a
large scale, depriving millions of people of online communication. Even
before the war, during the recent protests, internet restrictions had
become more severe and prolonged than in the past, interrupting
communication between activists for weeks.
However, people have acquired considerable experience and skill in
circumventing these restrictions. Tools such as the V2Ray protocols and
applications like Psiphon and Lantern are widely used, and whenever a
connection is available, Telegram remains one of the most important
communication platforms.
Satellite internet has also become important for some activists,
although access remains limited.
At the same time, the experience of recent years has shown that no
social movement can rely solely on the internet. The true foundation of
any social movement is built through direct relationships, mutual trust,
and real connections between people.
You warned against the risk of monarchists (who represented a small
minority in the protests) trying to use the movement as a springboard
for their own political project. To what extent do you think they were
successful?
Royalist factions have attempted to present themselves as the only
political alternative, using media platforms under their control and
with the support of some foreign governments. Reza Pahlavi and his
supporters have actively attempted to present themselves as a
transitional government and have received support from some
Persian-language media outlets and some Western governments.
However, the actual social base of this movement within Iran is much
more limited than its media presence suggests. Many of the people who
participated in the protests took to the streets against all forms of
authoritarianism and do not see the return of the monarchy as a solution.
In reality, a large segment of Iranian society understands very well
that replacing one form of authoritarianism with another is not a
solution. Therefore, we continue to emphasize that the future of freedom
in Iran lies neither in the restoration of the monarchy nor in the
continuation of other authoritarian structures, but in social
self-government and democratic forms of social organization.
From our perspective, the liberation of the Iranian people cannot be
the result of projects imposed by foreign powers. Freedom can only
emerge from the struggle and will of the people themselves, and turning
social movements into instruments of interstate rivalries inevitably
ends up harming society.
Is there anything else you think our readers should know about the
situation in Iran? And are there ways they can offer support?
It's important to understand that the people of Iran are not simply
passive victims of this war. Within Iranian society, many social
movements exist: workers, women, students, ethnic communities, and
anarchist activists who continue to resist and organize under extremely
difficult conditions.
Iranian society is complex, multiethnic, and dynamic, and the struggle
for freedom continues in many forms. What matters most is international
solidarity among popular movements, not support for state projects or
top-down solutions.
Readers outside Iran can play an important role by amplifying and
translating independent voices, organizing solidarity initiatives, and
helping to make social struggles in Iran more visible. The more these
voices are heard, the harder it will be to silence them.
We are here. We continue to organize and resist.
Neither the Mullahs nor the Shah!
Woman! - Life! - Freedom!
This article was published on the Freedom website on March 10, 2026
(https://freedomnews.org.uk/2026/03/10/iranian-anarchists-we-continue-to-organise-and-resist/).
https://alternativalibertaria.fdca.it/wpAL/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, UCADI, #206 - March 2026 (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Brazil, Capixaba, FACA: Factory floor, battleground! (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center