|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - Domination: The Real Enemy of Freedom (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 7 May 2026 07:24:23 +0300
If freedom is more than the absence of direct coercion, and if market
freedom is revealed as a mechanism of domination rather than liberation,
then what exactly are we fighting against when we fight for freedom? The
anarcho-communist answer is domination in all its forms. And this is a
considerably broader category than capitalism alone, though capitalism
is its most pervasive contemporary expression. Domination, in the
anarchist sense, is any relationship in which one party has the power to
compel another, to determine the conditions of their life, to extract
their labour, to limit their possibilities, to make them afraid, and
does so structurally, not merely as an individual act of violence.
Domination is not just the boss who screams at workers, it is the entire
wage system that makes workers dependent on bosses in the first place.
It is not just the racist police officer, it is the institutional
apparatus of racialised social control that makes certain bodies
systematically vulnerable. It is not just the abusive partner, it is the
patriarchal economic and cultural order that traps people in
relationships they cannot afford to leave.
Bakunin identified three primary sources of domination in his time: the
Church, the State, and Capital. He understood these as mutually
reinforcing structures, each one buttressing the others, each one
producing forms of unfreedom that interpenetrate and compound. The
Church mystified inequality as divinely ordained; the State enforced it
through law and violence; Capital extracted the surplus that made ruling
classes powerful enough to maintain both. To fight any one of these
without fighting the others was, for Bakunin, a self-defeating project.
Later anarchist thinkers extended this analysis. Emma Goldman and
Voltairine de Cleyre insisted that patriarchy had to be included as a
fundamental structure of domination, that the subordination of women was
not a side issue or a secondary contradiction but was built into the
very same logic of hierarchy and authority that anarchism opposed.
Goldman in particular understood that a revolution that liberated the
working class while leaving intact the domination of women would be no
revolution at all, only a rearrangement of who held power over whom. Her
concept of freedom was explicitly personal as well as political, it
included the freedom of sexual and reproductive self-determination, the
freedom to love who and how one chose, the freedom from the specific
unfreedoms that patriarchal institutions imposed on women's bodies and
lives.
Pyotr Kropotkin contributed a different but complementary insight, that
domination was not natural, not inevitable, not the expression of some
deep human drive toward hierarchy and competition. In Mutual Aid: A
Factor of Evolution, he argued, on the basis of extensive naturalistic
and historical evidence, that cooperation, solidarity, and mutual
support were at least as fundamental to animal and human life as
competition. The image of nature as red in tooth and claw, the Social
Darwinist story about the natural war of all against all, was
ideological, it naturalised the brutality of capitalism by projecting it
backward onto an imagined state of nature. In reality, human societies
had maintained themselves for most of history through networks of
reciprocal care and collective self-organisation. Hierarchy was a
historical imposition, not a biological destiny.
What this means for freedom is profound. If domination is not natural
but constructed, if authority, hierarchy, and exploitation are
arrangements that specific historical forces produced and maintain, then
they can be dismantled. Human beings are not doomed to oppress each
other. We are capable of organising our lives on the basis of free
association, mutual aid, and voluntary cooperation. Freedom is not a
utopian dream but a real human possibility, one that already flickers
into existence in the practices of solidarity, care, and collective
self-governance that persist even within capitalist society.
https://thepolarblast.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/to-be-free-together.pd
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #10-26 - Health and climate: is another front opening? We're in the clear - The Climate Crisis Notebook (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(it) France, UCL AL #370 - Editoriale - Il vecchio mondo sta morendo (ca, de, en, fr, pt, tr)[traduzione automatica]
A-Infos Information Center